The video has 2.3 million views. In it, a four year old is crying at a kitchen table, overwhelmed by something small and ordinary. A spilled cup. A broken cracker. The parent is filming from across the counter, narrating the moment with affectionate humor, adding a caption about the absurdity of toddler emotions. The comments are warm. The shares are enormous. The child has no idea any of this is happening.
She is four. She does not know what a view count is. She does not know that her face, mid sob, is being watched by strangers in thirty countries. She does not know that this moment, which she will not remember, is now permanently indexed, searchable, and attached to her name.
This is not an edge case. This is childhood in 2026.
The Archive That Arrives Before the Self
There is a developmental process that psychologists have studied for decades. It involves the slow, nonlinear construction of identity. A child begins to understand who they are through sensation, then through relationship, then through narrative. They piece together a self from fragments of experience, most of which are private, internal, felt rather than observed.
This process requires something that is easy to overlook. It requires obscurity. The freedom to try on selves and discard them. To be loud and then quiet. To contradict yourself Tuesday through Thursday and settle into something new by Friday. Identity, in its earliest stages, is experimental. It is supposed to be messy and unseen.
But when a child’s life is content, that obscurity disappears.
By the time some children are old enough to search their own names, they find an archive. Baby photos with hundreds of thousands of likes. Curated milestone posts. A narrative arc constructed by someone else, about a person who did not yet exist in any meaningful psychological sense. The identity was built before the inhabitant arrived.
Being Seen vs. Being Recorded
There is a difference between a child being seen by a parent and a child being recorded by a parent. Being seen is relational. It happens in real time, between two nervous systems, and it communicates something essential: you exist, you matter, I am here with you. Developmental psychologists call this attunement. It is one of the foundations of secure attachment.
Being recorded introduces a third presence into that moment. The audience. Even when the audience is imagined, even when the camera is “just for family,” the act of recording changes the quality of attention. The parent is no longer simply with the child. They are composing a version of the child for consumption.
Children feel this shift. They may not have language for it, but they register the difference between a parent who is watching them and a parent who is watching them through a screen. The lens becomes a barrier, thin but real.
Over time, some children begin to perform. Not because anyone asked them to, but because the environment taught them that their value is connected to their visibility. They learn to repeat the behaviors that generated the most engagement. They become, in a very specific and troubling sense, optimized.
The Pressure to Be Consistent
Here is where the psychology becomes particularly delicate. When a child’s early identity is documented and distributed publicly, it creates a kind of expectation. The child who went viral as a fearless toddler feels pressure to remain fearless. The child known for a particular talent at age six may feel that abandoning it at age twelve is a betrayal of the version of themselves that people loved.
Adults struggle with this. The gap between who you are and who the internet believes you are is one of the defining tensions of digital life. But adults, at least theoretically, chose to create their public personas. They had some agency in the construction. They can, with effort, walk away.
A child who was made into content before they could speak did not choose any of it. They inherit a public self the way you might inherit a house you never wanted to live in but feel obligated to maintain.
The developmental cost of this is subtle but real. Adolescence, which is already a period of intense identity negotiation, becomes exponentially more complicated when there is a searchable public record of who you used to be. The natural process of reinvention, which is not just healthy but necessary, meets resistance from an archive that insists you have already been defined.
The Loss of Private Becoming
What we are really talking about is the erosion of a space that previous generations took for granted. The space of private becoming. The unmarked, undocumented hours and years in which a person gradually figures out who they are without anyone watching, scoring, or commenting.
This space was never designed. It existed by default, because the technology to eliminate it did not yet exist. Now it does. And the question is not whether parents love their children. Of course they do. The question is whether love, combined with a camera and a platform, can inadvertently remove something a child needs in order to develop a self that actually belongs to them.
The research on this is still young, because the phenomenon itself is young. The first generation of children raised as content from birth is only now reaching adolescence. We are beginning to hear from them. Some describe a strange sensation of watching their own childhood as though it happened to someone else. Others report anxiety about deviating from the image their parents created. A few have begun requesting that their content be taken down, asserting ownership over a story they never agreed to tell.
Becoming Without an Audience
Technology did not create the impulse to document a child’s life. Parents have always kept records, taken photos, told stories about their children. What technology changed is the scale, the permanence, and the audience. A photo album in a closet is not the same as a public feed. A story told at a dinner table is not the same as a story told to two million strangers.
The difference is not just quantitative. It is qualitative. It changes what the documentation means, what it does, and who it serves. And in too many cases, it serves the parent’s need for connection, validation, or income at the expense of the child’s need for developmental privacy.
This is not a condemnation. It is an invitation to pause. To ask a question that the platforms will never prompt you to consider.
What does it cost a child to become themselves in public? And what might they discover about who they are if they were given the space to become in private, unfilmed, unbranded, uncaptioned, free to be no one in particular until they are ready to be someone real?
Digital Alma explores the intersection of technology, consciousness, and what it means to be human in an increasingly digital world.
Leave a comment